/x/ - Paranormal / Occult

Here's a question, Why aren't gulags and former concentration camps filled to the brim with ghosts? Why are places of genocide like Rwanda or Turkey fucked with ghosts?

Because they don't have souls.
>>1511
Too crowded and mainstream. Ghosts can't be all spooky if there's too many around in one place; if they try it'll just be clusterfuck. Ghosts are the opposite of humans in that way. People crowd together, ghosts isolate themselves.

I heard of a few. Some say nessie is one, and bigfoot is another.

>>1513
I beg to differ; ever run into hikkifags?

https://mega.nz/#F!7KoQzKqS!XhgA5uYbfshsDfFrGSJZBA

contains all the images

An interesting camera trick. It's kind of sad that this is more disturbing than most horror movies these days…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I2MsDogV4g4

>>1530
This looks like some student project.

I saw a video like couple of years ago where a russian guy sprayed graffitis on abandoned trains.Do any have that?

Something evil in his videos. You may be followed by misfortune if you indulge.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wo0decEybWo

Here is the original photo if you want to look. I had to edit it because it was horizontal

Pretty cool. The face looks like a horse's head.

That is a 90% match to the possessed horse from Berserk. Not convinced with this one.

The horse in question. Image didn't post properly the first time.

>>1589
Congrats, you're being haunted by the rape horse

The McDonalds pasta, you know the one.

>>1584
Not really, could you link it? I don't actually read creepypasta that often.

Sonic.exe, jeff the killer, basically any pasta that's popular, except ben drowned.

>>1585
Google "The McDonald's Building", I can't upload the pasta for some reason.

The Lesser Banishing Ritual of the Pentagram, Golden Dawn Variant.

One section from Liber Null by Peter J. Carroll, including banishing and sigil magic techniques.

Excerpts from the A.A.O. Handbook, which expounds the Root System Theory developed by that organization.

A favorite parable excerpted from The Magus, a novel by John Fowles. I have not read the whole book.

A few pages from the Psychonaut Field Manual by Bluefluke, a flippant but informative and wonderfully aesthetic beginner's guide to chaos magick.

>>1554
>The entirety of Europe not being economically dominant throughout its entire history means that Christianity was anti people using their brain to think for the betterment of society and make art
>What is a monastery?
>What is a manuscript?
Do a bit of research on those and then tell me how anti-research and thinking they are.

I just wanted to talk about Illuminati's and Secret Societies…

Please keep religious debates primarily in the realm of analysis. In the first place, religion is off-topic here except in some narrow contexts, such as religious mysticism practices. Back on track please, reply to the opening post.

Also less shitposting, this is not /ot/.

Not exactly cultism or spirituality, but it's a theory about a secret society. I'm sure most of you have seen this one.
http://www.strangeconspiracies.com/2011/04/final-fantasy-7-illuminati-manifesto.html

>>1541
>udaism in its more proper form did not even come to be until around the 6th century BC(E) and was a polytheistic religion before instead.
>>1541
>Judaism in its more proper form did not even come to be until around the 6th century BC(E) and was a polytheistic religion before instead.
Really? Source?

>>1320
Also, forgot to say this, but if you like watching scat films and want to talk about them, then I don't see a problem with that. Even if it arouses you, as long as other people aren't inconvenienced by it there's no problem.

>>1318
I don't know the word for this concept, but I've had this weird surreal feeling interacting with people whenever I come into it with the attitude that my morals and ideas aren't better or more just. There's almost this feeling of respect towards them. It's weird because it's not like I actively disrespected people or anything.

But, the thing I got out of this thread is to not shame people into a set of morals or shame them out of their morals (or opinions for that matter) but to merely share your ideas and express why you think that way.

The best example is the sex toy comments, I think.

>Personally, I think sex toys are for depraved people who can't just make do with their hand and have to go as far as to buy things for masturbation.

If I responded in a way that shames you like calling you a prude (much like how some people here were shaming snuff film watchers) then I'm just trying to enforce my beliefs by shaming.

However, giving reasons why someone might buy sex toys goes further. Like, I disagree with your statement, some people might have hand injuries that might make masturbating harder or even painful. Others might have difficulties with getting an orgasm. Or many other medical issues that might make masturbating or even regular sex hard to impossible. I do not think that these people are depraved. I'm just a guy who avoids the hookup culture and thought sex toys would prevent me from getting with the wrong woman. Plus, it's fun.

But I see what you mean, the amount of ideologues is staggering. People are becoming more and more divisive over their morals. And I was noticing this before this discussion, I just couldn't put my finger on it.

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>1320
>Watching people die isn't perverse or depraved. Perversion is the sexual attraction to abnormal things.
By that logic, dead/dying people are indeed a sexual thing since necrophiliacs and gurofags exist though.

>>1323
Getting aroused by death is perverse, but it isn't harmful if in moderation. As long as you don't go crazy and start killing people yourself or start spending hours jacking off to it, it's fine.

Somali -> English
>op op op op op op op op op op op op op op
"Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus"

>>1519
If you click the translated text you'll be able to edit it and send it as an alternative translation.
So if you should supposedly be able to make those messages yourself, but I just tried it and it didn't show up when I checked it on my phone, so I'm assuming that either:
>it'll only change if Google approves it
>it'll automatically change after N people sending the same edit
But if what you said about personal information is true, I don't know if googlefags would risk being sued, so the latter makes more sense.
So my theory is that the nonsensical translates are some sort of encrypted messages and people are proxyfagging to get them to actually show. Idk why though, if they have to get something across without being identified they could probably use something less botnet-y than Google, because I'm pretty sure they have all that shit logged, and there's also the fact that it's public and anyone can stumble upon it like you did.