/melon/ - Corey

I did leave this place for several reasons, only to check back like once in a year so considering that - OP's thread seems to be just as ridiculous as banning this anorecital stuff. Dude, some of us have already left, so what's stopping you to do the same?

>>286
> I guess your earlier claim that there were no homophobic undercurrents to your ramblings has been put into question by your overt admissions to transphobia.
1. Yet again: ultimately this is not about me. As I wrote: It is suggestive of a nefarious agenda and/or psychopathy to purposely and repeatedly try to draw attention away from ano rectal anatomy and physiology, rampant ano rectal violence, associated traumatic risks, and an epidemic of ignorance and misinformation. These topics, plus the voluminous amount of information from others, are far more important than anything about a lone person trying to raise awareness of them.
2. There is no phobia (fear) involved here. As I wrote elsewhere: "I am not anti-LGB. Those are merely sexual preferences. T (transgenderism) [or transsexuality] is much more than that, and many LGB people just might come to deeply regret their association with it." (Reference: https://web.archive.org/web/20230315004029/https://lainchan.org/hum/res/63618.html#63942 )

Many trans people most certainly do demonstrate characteristics of psychopathy, because they undeniably are trying to deceive and manipulate others. There just might be a considerable overlap here with people who engage in and/or promote ano rectal violence.
>>287
> banning this anorecital stuff
That is a misrepresentation: nowhere did I suggest banning anything. Rather, I suggested severely punishing perpetrators of significant ano rectal violence against one or more others, most especially such perpetrators who inspired countless viewers. Why those people ought to face justice, probably by any means necessary in many cases due to people and governments delaying for far too long, is explained quite sufficiently in the "justice" paste found in the OP image. Numerous facilitating factors that need to be addressed were covered as well.

>>288
>There is no phobia (fear) involved here.
I would like to clarify that, the word transphobia doesn't imply you are afraid of anyone despite part of it coming from the word "phobia", just like having a tradition doesn't necessarily mean you want to betray anybody, additionally, one word doesn't limit itself to its definition, rather, they are adapted to modern use and location, when you call someone a bitch you don't actually imply they are a female dog.
Oxford dictionary definition of transphobia:
>Dislike of or strong prejudice against transgender people.
Now with this out of the way, perhaps you can see that what is said is that you have a dislike and/or prejudice against people who identify as transgender, is that true?
Moreover, I will assume good faith, and not think you are resorting to third grader fallacies https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Etymological_fallacy
By the way I'm a Christian straight man with a dislike for anal insertions, I have no dog in this race, just pointing this out for the sake of discussion.

>>289
>the word transphobia doesn't imply you are afraid of anyone despite part of it coming from the word "phobia"
I'm calling bullshit on this. Letting your enemies choose the vocabulary you use is a bad idea, and its very obvious "transphobia" is malicious due to its subconscious implications. -phobia in any other context very obviously refers to "a fear of something, usually irrational". Online dictionaries changing definitions (some of which were already a bit fuzzy to begin with) on a whim is baseless, especially considering the fact its been done maliciously in other circumstances as well.

>>289 >>290
>arguing over semantics
"Phobia" currently has two definitions on Dictionary.com at the top, the second of which is "an aversion toward, dislike of, or disrespect for a thing, idea, person, or group." https://www.dictionary.com/browse/phobia

1. Like I said, ultimately this is not about me. There are much greater matters here about which people ought to be concerned. Whether I am transphobic or not by any particular definition is utterly unimportant. It doesn't affect the factuality of anything I wrote in the OP image, much less the factuality of what many others wrote.
2. A strong case can be made that a significant proportion of trans people are deceitful and manipulative. As I wrote in the OP, they are "Trying to convince many people they're something they're not, and attempting to manipulate people to accept them as they wish to be and not as they actually are."

Regardless, I should not have dragged trans[genderism|sexuality] into this at all. It is a distraction from those other matters I covered in the OP image, and a red herring to boot. I made a bad decision dictated by emotions, i.e. my anger and frustration towards Seisatsu. It doesn't really matter whether people use sites owned by the person or not. There most certainly may be sites operated by worse sorts out there.

Shitposting privilege.

>>149
it was supposed to be d-joe wearing a melon helmet.

[spoiler] What i love most about this fanbase is how I honestly thought it was a joke at first but after reading it, its actually kind of cool, but Ive realized its so big because we aren't hiding our autism [/spoiler]

>>198
Wait a sec, I was joking when I made these pics of the guy with the melon in the anus. You guys really took this seriously?

>>199
Its been a while but i think i remember that. So maybe.

>>199
>You guys really took this seriously?
Hell no.
I couldn't keep a straight face when I drew any of this crap.

This is still my favorite thing to ever come out of ubuu.
That's my confession.

An entire melon

Remember this day?

Corey will never take mention melons once and then have everyone obsess over i- oh wait

amen. This board is just… what the fuck. I don't even know WHY this should exist.

fight me

He's writing something else instead. Again, just on facebook. He's gonna wait a bit before making more D-Joe. Jee I wonder why