No.1862
uboa comes from a female, so yes.
is that YN manga?
No.1864
>>1863
not official but Kiki approved it, well it is a little more serious than just another fan made work
No.1865
>>1863
Are you rude or something? This is not even important and you are suggesting this implies you need to insult someone's ideas?
Dude, seriously, you are a huge dick.
No.1867
There's really no need to be a bunch of asshats over something you could just ignore and move on from.
No.1868
>>1866
>Go back to reddit.
I've never been to reddit. Do people tend to shoot down unnecessary insults by stupidly changing phrases there?
No.1869
OP has a nice theory.
Don't derail the thread.
No.1870
>>1869>OP has a nice theory.I disagree. It's simple, obvious, and only partially canon, and has no significance (uboa's gender doesn't matter to anything else).
The artist probably just drew uboa with a ponytail because poniko has a ponytail.
There are plenty of guys with ponytails too, so uboa being female isn't even a valid conclusion.
No.1871
>>1870AND this isn't /t/ AND there's already a thread for uboa's ponytail.
No.1872
I posted too hastily, can someone link the other uboa ponytail thread?
No.1874
Thank you, I am sorry for the inconvenience, I will search deeper before condoning a thread in the future.
No.1875
Boys wear ponytails tho
No.1880
>>1877Well, generally we assume monsters to be male, as well as genderless beings.
Hence why the twist where the monster is female is supreendent.
No.1883
>>1877
>When it transforms from PonikoI disagree, you don't know if it transforms from Poniko, or if Poniko is consumed by the monster when everything is dark.
I mean, for all we know, Uboa might've appeared when you turned the lights out, eliminating Poniko in the process, but not 'being born' from her. As a monster that appears in the night and eats someone.
It doesn't necessarily appear from Poniko.
Also
>>1880 No.1884
>>1881There is? I've been here for like five years and I've always been under the impression that Uboa was a genderless entity.
