>>1124Yeah they can get input. You got mine already: it's been said tons of times. You didn't take it very well though
And yes, you should go do that, as opposed to realizing that if anyone made a thread that went "Theory: Madotsuki was raped" or "Theory: Madotsuki had mental issues", they would get
zero serious responses
You want to work that dream eater thing into a bigger theory? Go ahead, I'll be happy to tell you my thoughts on it. But if all you have to say is that the Toriningen may be dream eaters, then all I have to say is that that's about as much news as "Mado was raped" and "Mado was crazy" would be
>>1125It's just a bunch of pixels, it may or may not look like a beak or a snout
Also Toriningen is nothing but a universally accepted fan-name. It's very unlikely that's their true name, so it hardly makes it the truth. It stuck, however, and it won't change now. In fact, I'll bet you anything that even if Kikiyama came forward and confirmed that they were indeed dream eaters, the fandom would still use the term Toriningen to refer to them. Unless he were to actually give them names, that is