No.12921
Women cannot be neet since they're basically getting paid to suck dick by their husband's paychecks and that could be counted as employment in my opinion.
No.12923
>>12922Are you getting paid to suck dick?
No.12926
>>12924Then I would reply with asking what are you doing on a neet board if you're so busy being "successful"? I think we both already know the answer to that.
No.12927
>>12926Read the sticky newfriend.
No.12929
>>12927No need, I'm just burning time until I get banned, then I'll just be back with another ip address.
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) No.12930
>>12928Well the name DOES say /n/ - NEET but it looks like you all lost your purpose here on the board in a pathetic attempt to look normal to the rest of the world. You are so cowardly that you cannot embrace being different and instead try to appeal to the general population(the workforce). What's the point of having a neet board I ask. At least rename it to something else.
No.12932
>>12931The point is a woman is not being neet by getting married and living off her husband's paychecks. She is being a housewife for a living. That is her job. Cleaning, rearing children, giving bjs, and you name it.
No.12933
>>12930>You are so cowardly that you cannot embrace being different and instead try to appeal to the general population(the workforce)Excuse me, but I never had nor I have a single friend or girlfriend, and I don't plan to have anything like that in the future. I hate parties, and I isolate myself from the rest. I am socially retarded, spent my whole life reading and studying and I wish half of this world was dead. Do you think working/studying makes you normal? It makes your penis hard to know you're so different? lol
I don't study for the title, just for the money. I give a fuck about society.
If you want to play the snowflake go to other place to brag about being kool keds NEET club.
No.12935
>>12933The point is if there's a NEET board and the posters aren't NEET then it completely fucking ruins the point of the board. There is no reason why a place can't be a "sekrit club": in other words excluding people who do not meet the criteria of the intended audience.
No.12936
>>12930Well, I have a job, a careeer and I'm building a future in which I hope to work more until the day I die, I can still think and discuss about NEET lifestyle and culture, even if I'm always complaining I know there is a culture worth debate.
There is a suggestions board over there too.
No.12937
Stay at home roles are still NEET's in the same sense that living with your parents is. Just leeching off of a different people.
Granted, it confuses me a little how someone who can achieve a relationship/friendship is unable to get at least a part time job. Short of the effects of depression…which afaik tend to make social relationships next to impossible as well.
Just never adds up to me. But I don't know anyone significantly enough to really have an understanding one way or the other.
No.12938
>>12935There's no fucking criteria, this board was created to discuss anime and turned into cirlejerking whining, if you find any criteria in that just tell me.
No.12940
>>12935Then, you're a NEET right?
Okay so let me read it again.
>Women can't be NEET.>People who work are disgusting normie sheeps who feed the horrible society.>People who are not NEET must not post here.You're literally NEET's Hitler.
No.12942
>>12939>trying to reverse the situationNo anon, I'm the one enjoying the flaming, you're the one whining that non-NEETs cannot participate.
Keep going please, you just discovered ubuu's most hidden secret. Please, keep complaining.
No.12945
>>12942Reversal of the situation is not necessary since it is clear who is getting rustled.
>>12943Well they can't since they got married for a paycheck which could count as a type of employment.
No.12946
>>12940It takes away the point of "not your secret club" if they make fun of NEETs and virgins, or pity them. Then it just becomes a secret club for normies.
No.12948
>>12945>>12946>braggingI only mentioned I study because you asked. If that's bragging for you then you're bragging you're part of the kool keds club.
Btw, studying doesn't mean you're normal.
>making fun of NEETS an virginsI never did, in fact I respect NEETs and I'm a virgin. I've been in this board for years giving advice for people to improve their life, your statement is just fucking ridiculous.
No.12949
>>12946Are all the non-neet "normies"?
No.12950
>>12947Why would non-NEETs want to discuss about the non-NEET lifestyle? They don't know jack shit about it.
Let's make a board for employment and make sure that all of the jobless NEETs feel welcome to come in and say "I'm NEET but I'm gonna discuss jobs with you even though I don't know jack shit about working."
No.12952
>>12951
Let me guess, you went to HS then moved on to college and then got a job after college and you're on this board discussing NEETdom like you're a sage.
No.12953
>>12950>implying people who used to be NEETs can't get a jobKeep trying to keep the sikrit kewl klob image pure, anon. Keep trying.
No.12956
>>12952I didn't speak for myself in that, but if you want to know so hard, I tried getting a job and then since I didn't find anything went to college and applied to my studies. Does it means I was a NEET for a long time? No. But I was one. I know how shitty it can be, and it isn't like NEET life-style is that deep man.
No.12959
>>12950>They don't know jack shit about it.Even Psychiatrists and Sociologists?
No.12962
>>12959Yes they are some of the biggest normalfags that lack the capacity to understand anything deeper than the surface level. Most of their reasoning is based on human behavior instead of the reason why.
No.12963
>>12961So I attending to college for a year before actually tring to attend to college and that's why I wasn't a NEET? Cool argument man, 10/10 logic
No.12964
>>12963So you spent an year being NEET at the age of 18 and think you're some oldfag NEET who knows everything. Typical.
No.12966
>>12960>NEETs can not suddenly get a job?For the most part no, they cannot.
>once they get a job they forget about their NEET life?They don't forget about it, but they recognize they are no longer NEET, and respect others who actually are NEET by not entering areas that are intended solely for people who are NEET.
No.12967
>>12962So you think you can label and judge science and academics worldwide just like that?
You must be a very intelligent person
No.12969
>>12964I had debts to pay and I didn't have money. That was stressing as fuck, if you're telling me I don't know anything because you're 'older true neet' when you are living off somebody else is just playing easy modo.
>>12966>They don't forget about it, but they recognize they are no longer NEET, and respect others who actually are NEET by not entering areas that are intended solely for people who are NEET.
>everybody should do and believe what I do and believe inYeah, right. Nice try.
No.12973
>>12971My argument is that every persons thinks the way they fucking want, and that you're just whining that people don't think like you because of >muh chan NEET culture
No.12974
>>12972You are perhaps the dumbest person I've ever met on the internet and that is saying a lot. You cannot even understand arguments much less make good points. I think I'm done here but I can say with certainty that this board is shit and I'm glad I have nothing to do with this shit normie infested board.
No.12975
Dude, you see the topic over there.
>Advice / Social / "Shitposting"The shitposting part didnt include the ("") before, do you know why?
People took it literal… I mean, this is not a board for shitposting, still the word "shitposting" is there.
That is because Uboachan is like this, and users understand why is it like this, you won't expel non-NEET people, as you can't expel non-devs from /fg/, you can't change this website, you can't change this board, you can't even change the thoughts of users in your own thread, if you were serious, which I doubt.
Welcome to Uboachan, if you don't like it you can post in /sug/ or gtfo and build your own secret club, if you're so hardcore.
>>12970Toppest of the keks.
No.12979
>>12974>You cannot even understand arguments much less make good pointsExecept your points and answers to my points where:
>people don't think like me so they're wrong!>>12976So you're telling me you have a big dick because others should support your opinions? that's literally the most normie thing you can think of. You should be ashamed, pure kewl anon. You're not a NEET anymore.
No.12981
>>12980You're the one who started acting master race lord NEET lol
No.12983
>>12981I just simply stated that it's okay for NEETs to have their own boards and you're so buttmad about it.
Stop trying to reverse the situation.
No.12984
>>12983>I just simply stated that it's okay for NEETs to have their own boards and you're so buttmad about it.Go make one then, you're free to do it, this is not the only-for-NEET place you want.
No.12985
>>12980>>12983I give a fuck what you think, I only pointed out why this board isn't NEET-only, and why. You're the one complaining.
>No I'm really not mad that I'm stupid and I only got hired because I'm a stupid goyim.As if, I'll end investing all this money I'm saving and start getting paid for doing nothing. Literally, living the dream.
>inb4 oh no more bragging! No.12988
>>12986Except I don't have a job, faggot.
>>12987I don't even live in 'murrica, Ultimate NEET master. Here that is actually a possibility. Whether you want to accept it or not is your problem.
No.12994
Suddenly reddit
No.13002
>>13001Again, so far this is an incredibly stupid debate based on "Women can't be NEET".
There are women who are NEET.
This is fact.
If you're going to argue ratios, then be clear and argue ratios. Less women are NEET? Sure, whatever.
But all that's happening now is
I don't have words for this. It's like the mental equivalent of smearing shit all over your body.
No.13003
>>12999How do you even know what most women are?
You're a sexist cunt
No.13005
Hey tolerant and diverse posters of /n/, I've heard you denying that this is a secret club and that you welcome people from all walks of life in uboachan, so I'll be sharing some of my amusing sex experiences and interesting things I did with my friends at the university!
I'll make sure to give you updates every day of the week. I hope you won't mind.
No.13006
>>13005That happens a lot, as long as you don't turn them into shitposting it's okay.
I wonder if OP will respond to checkmate post.
No.13008
>>13007Fact remains you're a sexist ass who thinks he can judge all the women, sociologists and psychologists in the world and won't read the sticky to stop being cancer.
No.13010
>>13006>>13004>>13001>If almost any young woman can shack up with a boy, then it follows that any boy can be shacked up with
What sort of flawed, delusional just world fallacy is that? Women can shack up with any normalfag boy, but not with someone who isn't socially adjusted enough.
No.13011
>>13010and because of the same logic women can be NEET and not housewitches.
and also, men who live as spouses and let the woman work, are housewitches too, what do you think about that?
No.13014
>>13011I'm not the OP. A very small percentage of women can be NEET, but none of them are legitimate hikkikomori's. There's a reason why polls show hikki's are 99% male.
Can you think of any "egalitarian", "non-sexist" reason for those statistics? If not, I'll tell you right away it's because women receive an unproportional amount of social validation in our society, and they are genetically wired to be more neurotypical by default ( Read about the anatomy of the female prefrontal cortex )
However, the OP was referring to housewives, and might've not explained himself very well in the title.
Housewitches cannot be NEET's, and neither can Chadbands who do housework.
No.13015
>>13014Being hikikomori has nothing to do with being NEET, tho…
No.13016
>>13015That was just an off-topic clarification on the subject of the hikki label which led to some controversy in this thread.
The fact that housewives cannot be NEET's should be self-explanatory, as they are engaged in housework. The same is true for the male equivalent.
No.13020
>>13017So, will you accept this imageboard is for everyone, or buld your own?
No.13022
>>13019>This is not a secret club>WIZARDCHAN GET OUTMore proof you just want a sekret club where you can talk to grils and laugh at NEETs.
No.13024
>>13022That's precisely my point. Wizardchan is a secret club. This is not. What I was saying that people who want to feel like they are in a secret club should be on wizardchan instead of here.
Don't twist my words.
No.13025
>>13024You are kicking people out while saying it is not a secret club, hence irony.
No.13026
>>13025I'm not kicking anyone out, I'm just saying that it's not the right place to be if people who are not NEET/male/virgin make you mad.
No.13027
>>13019>No one here is demonized for being born with a certain pair of genitals or having a job.Yet you regularly demonize male hikki's and their opinions.
No.13028
>>13026But why can't you stop being mad about male NEET virgins who are mad at non-male NEET virgins?
This board endorses free speech right?
No.13029
>>13027Could you link to a specific post where a person who specifically states they are male and hikki are demonized solely because of it?
Your opinions are subject to judgement, as are anyone elses.
No.13030
>>13029Then why are you so upset when your worldview or beliefs are being judged by "Wizardchan"? Perhaps you should debunk the point of the arguments instead of suggesting that they leave.
No.13031
>>13028If someone is mad or arguing in a heated manner, others getting mad and arguing back is a natural response. It doesn't depend on what gender or social class you are.
You came here to vent and to argue, and you're surprised that you get that in response?
No.13032
>>13029Can you link to a post where someone rebutted the OP instead of crying sexism or shitposting?
No.13033
>>13031>You came here to vent and argueNo.
No.13034
>>13031Provide evidence that anyone is arguing in a "heated" manner and not just passionately defending their stance.
Furthermore, you can continue arguing on your own accord instead of trying to make the opposition depart.
No.13035
This is what we are now.
>>13023Kill me for using Google images, this is not 4chan btw
No.13037
>>13036Not that memeguy, the SJW plus normalfag discussion
No.13038
>>13030What if you don't want to argue? The person who argues being in an environment where they will be accepted and supported instead of one where they will be ridiculed is better for them.
>>13032That requires reading the whole thread. Most just don't give enough fucks to do that.
Let's pick a couple of points that I did read:
>Women cannot be NEETThere are women that are NEET, therefore this statement is false.
>Stay-at-home spouses are not NEETsThis is partly true; they are NEET because they do not have a job that is taxed and considered official employment, but they still work. There is a large margin of women who are not married/not in a relationship, so this is irrelevant to the title of the post.
>Women cannot be neet since they're basically getting paid to suck dick by their husband's paychecksWomen like that still are NEET [not working, not in training or studies] but they are financially stable. There is a large margin of women who are not married/not in a relationship, so this is irrelevant to the title of the post.
>Women receive an unproportional amount of social validation in our society, and they are genetically wired to be more neurotypical by defaultIt's true that it's easier for a woman to express emotion or to approach people of a different sex. It is also true that it's more common for a woman to receive unwanted attention or to be mistreated solely because of her gender. It is easier to get a manual or physically taxing job as a man, even if their female counterpart has an equal amount of strength and training.
Here is a study about the demographics of depressed people -
http://www.cdc.gov/mentalhealth/data_stats/depression.htm. Women are statistically more likely to be depressed.
Here is a study about demographics in anxiety disorders.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21439576 Women are more statistically more likely to have anxiety disorders.
The problem with this thinking is generalizing. The argument of this thread could have been expressed much better if it was talking about margins rather than absolutes [x can definitely not be y; x does y to acheive z, no exceptions]
No.13039
>>13037You realize /pol/ embodies normalfags at their worst.
No.13041
>>13038>unwanted attentionNo such thing.
No.13042
>>13038>What if you don't want to argue?I don't even understand why is it seen as an argument. Housewives aren't NEET's by general definition. Not like it matters, since you claim this board isn't for NEET's anyway.
No.13043
>>13041I sincerely hope you're trolling. If not, you might want to consult with people who have been stalked or raped [both male and female]
No.13044
Ok starting by the fact that this dude ignores the sticky, wants to change /n/ and evades a ban, no one can take this seriously, then why so much arguing over little stuff?
>ur scrt club>no ur normalfg>no ur sexist>no ur sjw>no ur /pol/>no ur tumblrI suggest Mr. lock lock over here
>>13040/pol/ is not about being Nazi, for the love of Seisatsu.
Pic related
No.13045
>>13043Unwanted attention is a weird word for rape.
No.13046
>>13043How are the rape statistics these days? Have we reached 50% of all females yet?
No.13047
>>13038>Women are statistically more likely to be depressed.>Women statistically more likely to have anxiety disorders.I'm not even going to try and explain to you what's wrong with those self-reported and lightly diagnosed "mental disorders" which women think they have.
All that those articles confirm is that women are far more likely to identify as depressed or socially anxious. Depressed because their boyfriend dumped them, or being anxious about going on stage in front of their friends, sure.
But how are you trying to refute the fact that women receive more social validation and usually fare better on average than men in socializing with this information is beyond me.
No.13048
>>13045I am using an extreme as an example. It is a common thing to receive attention that you find unpleasant. It still doesn't warrant the insane amount of complaining SJWs do, but it is a thing that happens. Saying that it doesn't is just silly.
>>13046There is a wiki article about that if you want to read it. It's impossible to accurately assess the percentages of males and females raped because so many cases go unreported. What's your point?
No.13049
>>13047Those are peer-reviewed articles that only take people diagnosed by professionals into consideration.
No.13051
>>13038> It is also true that it's more common for a woman to receive unwanted attention or to be mistreated solely because of her gender.Aren't you forgetting that males are assaulted and fall victim to all sorts of physical battery much more frequently than women during their lifetime, in childhood and afterwards?
Or does assaulting a male because of his gender, because he is expected to "man up and fight back" unlike a woman, does not count as mistreatment by your account?
No.13052
>>13049I'm sorry to break the news to you but your "professional diagnosis" is a sham. See Rosenhan experiment for more details.
And like I've said, even if they are properly "diagnosed", how does that affect the allegations about the social capabilities of females?
You can be a depressed girl with a steady social circle and rich sexual history, and you can be an apathetic male who's completely shunned by his peers.
Why do you even factor Social Anxiety and Depression in estimating the social status and cultural position of women?
No.13053
>>13050I don't see the relation.
No.13054
>>13051
>Aren't you forgetting that males are assaulted and fall victim to all sorts of physical battery <…> more frequently than womenCould you give me a source for that? I can't find anything upon looking this up.
And no, assaulting anyone is no acceptable, whether they are a man or a woman doesn't matter.
>You can be a depressed girl with a steady social circle and rich sexual history, and you can be an apathetic male who's completely shunned by his peers.You can also be a depressed male with a steady social circle and a rich sexual history and it is possible to be a depressed female with no friends and no sexual history. This greatly depends on where you live, what kind of people surround you, and also on how physically attractive and charismatic you are, even if you have mental health issues.
>Why do you even factor Social Anxiety and Depression in estimating the social status and cultural position of women?Because these two disorders greatly cripple your ability to socialize and maintain relationships.
No.13055
>>13053Yeah me neither, the holocaust never happened btw
No.13056
There are many more friendless virgin males than females, and it is demeaning for "I'm a virgin it was just a blow job" people to think they have it the same as people who deal with loneliness and alienation, and then actually shit on those people for being "elitist".
No.13057
>>13055That's an extreme position to take.
No.13058
>>13054>Could you give me a source for that? I can't find anything upon looking this up.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_differences_in_crime#Statistical_dataThere is a notable disparity under the Canadian statistics, but for some reason cases of Aggravated Assault aren't listed for the US and other countries, and milder Assaults and Batteries aren't even addressed in any website I reviewed.
You should also remember that most non-weaponized assaults against males which don't leave permanent damage go un-persecuted and ignored. Especially when involving minors.
If you really refuse to admit the prevailing climate in our society that it's ok to hit a male, but not ok to hit a woman, then we don't have much to talk about because you are being obtuse on purpose.
>This greatly depends on where you live, what kind of people surround you, and also on how physically attractive and charismatic you are, even if you have mental health issues.>Because these two disorders greatly cripple your ability to socialize and maintain relationships.Yet the number of male Hikkimori's, friendless males, and males who report a lack of success in finding a partner ( NOTE: ANY PARTNER, NOT JUST MS.RIGHT ) is significantly higher.
Look at the target audience of people who rant about people in a relationship, non-virgins, the socially successful etc.. they're all males. Why can't we see any women as vehement about enforcing those "loser standards"? Because those women don't exist.
No.13059
>>13058Look at the target audience of people who rant about people in a relationship, non-virgins, the socially successful etc.. they're all males. Why can't we see any women as vehement about enforcing those "loser standards"? Because those women don't exist.
If you are talking about discussion on imageboards and places like reddit, many just choose to not specify their gender. Saying that you are female in a place where that might cause backslash or prevent people from reading what you said without prejudice is not desirable.
No.13061
>>13059Sounds like the system works exactly as intended. Why should people be encouraged to blog if the people with opinions worth hearing stay silent anyway?
No.13062
>>13059That's a poor excuse. You know full well that there's no female equivalent of Wizardchan or other "secret hermit clubs" or what have you. When was the last time you saw a woman attacking someone for being a normalfag? What about a woman chiding someone for talking about his social life or partner?
You've hardly encountered any because women never have any of the aforementioned difficulties unless it's by choice, and women always strive to be subservient to social trends and are loathe to reject and denounce them.
No.13063
>>13062attacking someone for being a normalfag is retarded and intolernat anyway
No.13064
This thread is so rich, I can't believe some of the neckbeards here actually believe what they're typing
It's fucking hilarious
No.13065
>>13063Good job on missing the point, idiot. I wasn't passing moral judgement on the phenomena, only employing it as a method to rule out widespread existence of female "hikki's" or "social outcasts" as attributed to them.
It follows that, if there is no substantial, major gap in male and female behavior, and consequently their social aptitudes and tendencies, then there should be just as many "retarded and intolerant" women as men.
So why can they never be observed in action? Is it because women are mentally superior, or because one of the underlying premises ( That the percentage of female outcasts and socially impaired is comparable to men ) is wrong? I think it's the latter option.
No.13067
>>13064Why are you being sexist and generalizing them as neckbeards? Maybe there are legbeards among them as well?
You aren't a misandrist, correct?
No.13068
>>13066Except this is actually not your secret club, or a NEET exclusive place.
Plus, was OP who started discrimination.
Plus, /n/ is for anyone, NEETs have been posting happily every day here before your arrival, which was yesterday, my new and special anon.
No.13070
>>13068What if I told you there are some of us long-term user NEET's, who would be more than happy to see the NEET board transformed into a primarily NEET board, and not just a shitposting board with a NEET minority?
Would that surprise you?
No.13073
>>13071
Assuming he has a static IP. There are also a lot of paranoid/privacy obsessive guys who filter their connections with VPN's, especially on imageboards.
No.13077
>>13070>old userYEAH RIGHT
No.13079
>>13076Maybe they got tired of the pretense and move on to more suitable communities.
No.13080
>>13070If you were an old user, of if the other hardcode-desu NEET were an old user, they would've complained about this when the "This isn't a secret club" thread was brought up, months ago (not even that old).
Nice try.
No.13082
>>13080Why would many of them be expected to entertain an openly hostile thread?
No.13083
>>13066>>13070Read the sticky, this site is like this, trying to change a website's culture is just being cancer, post about it on /sugg/ or get out of our community.
No.13085
>>13080{cont}
And you are blatantly twisting my words. I said it would be preferable to have a more sizable chunk of NEET's on the board, rather a NEET minority. Not a secret club.
No.13089
>>13082Because it wasn't a hostile thread, anon, they could've posted there.
And the "hostility" you see here is a byproduct of the cancerous attitude some shitheads "muh neet culture" kids are having trying to turn this webpage into a secret club.
There are neet here, who did discuss about NEET life, asked for advice, and discussed other topics, as well as there were non-neet who aren't social butterfly non-virgin ALPHA MACHO men, nor women who were sluts, though it's obvious there surely were sluts and macho men, but you can't control the traffic.
This isn't a neet-only board, it is a board for people who want advice to get out. There IS people who got out, hence they try to get their peers.
This board is inside Uboachan, which is a Yume Nikki Imageboard, which is likely to attract people who isn't good at socializing and such, not neet and hikikomori only.
Accept it, don't try to impose what you wwant on others who don't want the same, and you won't have hostility.
>>13085Same for you, anon. This board has at much 200 users, I bet at least 150 have some kind of social problem, and I can't tell exactly how much of them are actually neet since it is fashion and a lot tend to distort the truth just to fit. But this isn't a neet-only board, it was named because of that since it's a /jp/'s homage, and this board was created to dicuss anime and manga instead of psychology.
You want to talk about neet life-style? Too bad, I wanted to discuss anime, and this board was overflowed with neet content. Did I complaint? What's the point, /2/ was created.
If you want a neet-only board, go make yours. Nobody is stopping you.
No.13092
https://wizardchan.org/v9k/res/184814.html#185578 Look what I found, friends.
Please don't give me bullshit about being "long-term users".
No.13096
>>13092>Why even bother? It's a board filled with normalfags. They'll never understand.But wizardchan v9k whims constantly about wanting to have repulsive 3dpd relationships and complains about women instead of turning their hate into love for their waifus. I even bet most of them don't even have waifus.
That's by far more normie shit than some crap I've been read here. Arguin that uboachan is filled with normies is just admiting they're as disgusting as the userbase here.
>but muh chan culture states that ur normie if u got workz or studyEven there they discuss about work and the some members of the staff are actually in college or work.
Suck it up, wizz, you're as normie as any other webpage. Tohno is maybe the purest chan right now.
No.13098
>>13089Bans were handed out for arguing against the "not a secret club" which by the way is a lie since it is still a secret club, for normies pretending to be NEET.
No.13100
>>13098>Bans were handed out for arguing against the "not a secret club" which by the way is a lie since it is still a secret club, for normies pretending to be NEET.I'm checking the thread, nobody said anything against it.
No.13101
>Wizfagchan
>Wish I had a girlfriend and friends sob sob
>Calling anyone else a normie
k
No.13103
>>13102To be fair, its just Wizchan trolling in /n/ and ploting a /b/ raid, its far away from a board war since I don't think any of us care enough…
No.13106
>>13103>uboachan is a bad place dont go there>yeah they suck>what about if we do a raid>ya right m8thats basically a board war.
also, file.
No.13111
The Neet title was never meant to be taken literally to mean this board is NEETs only club, but seems people have been taking it literally way too often (leading to dumb arguments like these). While it'd be nice if more people could just read the 3 word board description, perhaps renaming /n/ to something more general would also help.
No.13113
Women in general cannot be NEET as they would get piss everywhere when they try to into piss bottles
No.13115
Wizbies pls leave and stay leave
No.13116
>>13114I never said I was part of the secret club. Why don't you read the rest.
Now I bet you will start saying bullshit like I have a car and success and women and I have a social life lol.
No.13117
>>13116If someone breaks into your house will you yell "LE SEKRIT GLUBB xD"
Ahah wow why am I on a neet board if im not neet hmm
No.13118
>>13117Read the sticky, newfriend.
Also, you're literally restarting the thread, learn to fucking read before throwing random flaming.
>but ur in college ur normalfeggGo back to wizchan to complain you don't have dirty 3dpd, impure heathen.
No.13120
>>13119I'd say I'm more amused than butthurt. You all feign your purity when you all are just as disgusting as normies.
>why I can't I get laid>why I don't have friendsNice 3dpd normalfag lifes you want, huh. Do you also use windows?
No.13121
>>13118When did I say normalfag buddy :^)
No.13122
>>13120Wizchan is anti 3D retard.
Nice me-me tho man lol windows xD
No.13124
>>13121Is this your best "argument"?
>>13122>Denying the virgin rant that goes on and on in /v9k/>Anti 3DAlso, using windows isn't a fucking meme, it means you're a fucking pleb.
No.13127
>>13125>>13126LE LE LE LE LE
No.13128
>>13124>finds fault in my argument>assumes I use Windows because of my argumentNice fallacy chad
No.13130
>>13129Idk what ur talkin bout
Im just being myself bro
No.13131
>>13129>calling my replies baitIs this your "argument"?????????
No.13132
>>13106Are you f kidding me holy crap.
Mods are having lots of problems with this shit, this isnt funny.
No.13134
>>13132>CP bots>>13131>>13130>>13128>>13126>>13125>>13122>>13121>>13119>>13117>>13114This should be reported. All your IPs will be involved involved in legal shit now.
Congrats "bro".
No.13135
>>13134I'm not using windows so le fbi will have to le FUCK OFF
No.13136
>>13135You know that if legal issues get involved, le wizzchen will have to explain this shit, right?
If the sites closes up is all your fault for playing le edgy kids.
No.13138
That's enough fun for now. No board wars.
