[ yn / yndd / fg / yume ] [ o / lit / media / og / ig / 2 ] [ ot / cc / x / sugg ] [ hikki / rec ] [ news / rules / faq / recent / annex / manage ] [ discord / matrix / scans / mud / minecraft / usagi ] [ sushigirl / lewd ]

/sugg/ - Suggestions / Meta

Site meta-talk, help, suggestions, and moderation discussion
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1498246893322.jpg (92.67 KB, 1280x720, maxresdefault.jpg)

 No.3184[Reply]

Good evening my friends. I am here today because I consider it my duty, for the betterment of this community to bring to your attention a matter of unprecedented import which should by no means be overlooked by any member of the moderation team here at uboachan. Unfortunately, I have come to know through events which I will go into later, that one of the moderators whom you have put great trust into is currently abusing their privileges for personal gain. It is now my burden to inform you of this gross miscarriage of justice. You see, today I have been banned for posting the image file which I have attached to my post. As you can clearly see, this is a rare specimen of the animal kingdom, an atretochoana, which I wanted to share with other users for the purposes of zoological speculation. It is unbelievably crass to deny the pursuit of biological study through censorship, particularly in this case wherein nothing of a potentially offensive nature is involved. As I am sure you will understand, I am utterly sickened and confused by this decision. I hope this notice finds a person of sound mind, and I urge you to reconsider your decision.

Sincere Regards,
Anonymous animal biologist.
7 posts and 4 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.3199

File: 1499018781426.gif (Spoiler Image, 612.54 KB, 799x600, thecageisopen3.gif)

>>3197

 No.3200

File: 1499019536172.gif (Spoiler Image, 3.73 MB, 944x934, itstoolate5.gif)

ITS TO҉O LATE FOR YOU NOW

… SEISATSU …

ITS FREE

 No.3201

File: 1499035881517.png (508.48 KB, 592x800, megashrug.png)


 No.3213

File: 1500522373392.webm (3.4 MB, 1920x1080, sei.webm)


 No.3214

This is a good thread


File: 1499568993079.png (254.92 KB, 504x634, What does the fox say.png)

 No.3202[Reply]

So is most of /hikki/ just gone then? Were the posts actually deleted out of the database, or can they be recovered?
5 posts omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.3208

>>3207
Mostly just single word posts with pictures of stale memes. Some of them advertised a raid forum. One was just heh with a picture of the Egyptian god and a description of the perfect shit poster. Another had the spider woman blow job. Very boring stuff.

 No.3209

Yeah, looks like 86 threads are gone
Why did that happen?

 No.3210

>>3205
Can you do a select on the backed up table where the post id is not equal to the current post ids on /hikki/, or by last bump time (i'm guessing this is stored somewhere due to the current thread ordering), or something?

of course it's possible that it could be a lot harder than that based on the table structure and how data is stored on the server, so i could be totally wrong

 No.3211

Atleast my thread is still alive.

 No.3212

>>3209
>Yeah, looks like 86 threads are gone
>In /hikki/
Good.


File: 1497681811203.jpg (27.34 KB, 372x280, 6389d1339166295-children_f….jpg)

 No.3172[Reply]

Rule 1: You must not be under 18 years of age, reveal your age, or ask someone else's age.

Rule 1 was set up basically to cover my ass since this is an nsfw site. I ban people who reveal themselves to be underage so that I am not knowingly allowing minors to possibly view nsfw content, but also ask that people just not talk about it.

Do you think there are any problems with the way this rule is written or has been implemented? I cannot unfortunately remove the 18+ requirement itself, but some people are unhappy with not being able to talk about age-related subjects currently.
5 posts omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.3179

>>3177
It could make someone feel uncomfortable or intimidated to reveal their age if they're under 18. I know uboanchan is not the sort of website where intimidation is commonplace, but I agree with the rule for forbidding asking.

If they're under 18, they shouldn't be using the site, but still.

 No.3180

>>3179
I didn't know this was a safe space where everybody was entitled to being comfortable. My bad. Maybe profane language should also be banned. That could make somebody uncomfortable too, right?

 No.3181

>>3180
I will not have this discussion unless you will be logical and rational

 No.3182

>>3181
>logical and rational
>but still
You expect me to be rational when you tried to use, "but still", in your reasoning? "But still", is the exactly opposite of logical.

 No.3183

Discussion of age in the general is probably ok, specifically asking people their ages maybe not so much. Need to be 18+ to use the site in the first place, and there's not much use in getting people's actual ages. I vote keep as-is.


File: 1493216372446.png (102.46 KB, 420x248, marisa.png)

 No.3157[Reply]

Okay ubuutts, ITT we suggest Sei words to filter and replace with other words so we can be comfy.
I'll start with two.

"Undertale" for Meme game

"Discord" for Cancer or Circlejerk
6 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.3164

>>3161
>Madostuki > Frisk
You motherfucker

 No.3165

>>3161
This. This right here is beautiful.

 No.3166

>>3161
God, that's perfect.

 No.3167

>>3162
I dont think word filters are horrible as long as their is some graphical distinction so people immediately know the word had been filtered. In the ~2011 era of 4chan filtered words were colored differently.

 No.3174

Test -> Ban me


File: 1319335516433.gif (4.59 KB, 650x450, ps1325_2.gif)

 No.76[Reply]

Don't know who will see this, but the download link for Yume Nikki on the site FAQ doesn't work.
1 post omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.78

>>76
Fixed.

 No.79

>>77
http://uboachan.net/error404.html
http://uboachan.net/error403.html
http://uboachan.net/error500.html

 No.80

>>79
omg the server error page is adorable

 No.3169

>>79
those links don't work

 No.3170

File: 1496953072073.png (495.23 KB, 698x882, 58117e6559fdc52169d7b73c87….png)

>>3169
Is this some kind of abstract humor?


File: 1496654567287.gif (1.92 MB, 700x1050, tumblr_o24qitktjM1sqqsygo1….gif)

 No.3168[Reply]

photography gif

 No.3171

Moved to >>>/ot/17590.


File: 1464436860774.png (51.28 KB, 678x296, suggpossiblewayback.PNG)

 No.2951[Reply]

https://archive.org/web/
Thanks to a suggestion on https://uboachan.net/ot/res/15010.html#q15030 I thought we could do our own wayback for research.
3 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.3111

File: 1481978358406.png (68.83 KB, 480x800, Screenshot_2016-12-17-12-0….png)

I found captures of a thread that was deleted due to thread limit:
https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://uboachan.net/ot/res/10937.html

 No.3112

>>3111
Hey, why are my posts in that thread deleted? FUCKING MODS EXPLAIN ME, THEY WERE THE FUNNIEST ONES, HE EVENT WENT APE SHIT AT THE END.
STAND UP!
STAND UP!

 No.3113

File: 1482063953339.png (232.26 KB, 480x437, Screenshot_2016-12-18-12-2….png)

>>3112
>'… they were the funniest ones.'
I don't belive that the thread was funny in anyway. This is a research into wayback, non-derail.
>'… at the end.'
>>3003
>'why are my posts in that thread deleted?'
The thread was deleted due to what I believe was a 'thread limit' of sorts. I was also asking this question too, anon-san.
Have you looked at the Wayback Machine for other funny posts? I think I have jumped on the bandwagon, learning from past mistakes.

 No.3141

File: 1487365720394.png (148.28 KB, 480x800, Screenshot_2017-02-17-20-5….png)

I believe that RTs Vol. IV is going soon. Vol. III made my heart shocked when I checked the /ot/ board because of thread limits.

I'm not sure on the first two Volumes or where they are (deleted?)

 No.3154

>>3141
Found two captures of Random Thoughts IV.
https://web.archive.org/web/20160204101905/https://uboachan.net/ot/res/11490.html


File: 1467750192092.png (4.91 KB, 299x276, Fsjal_No_picture_availble2….png)

 No.2973[Reply]

I've seen the suggestion tossed around in various places on the site that forced anon should be enabled on certain boards. Is this a good or bad idea and why, and for what boards? I may try this out only if there is an overwhelmingly positive response, since it's a fairly big change that could potentially upset a number of users.

Post your arguments here.
49 posts and 13 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.3024

>>3022
This.

 No.3025

>>3022
This

 No.3150

>>3022
testing undertale

 No.3151

>>3022
So, why are you guys so anti-memegame?
Just testing…

 No.3152

>>3151
Nice try, everybody knows that sei will never filter memegame.


File: 1486245652645.gif (608.68 KB, 250x250, slowclap.gif)

 No.3136[Reply]

Congratulations for this short period of time without incidents and/or drama.
6 posts omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.3145

Corey was the best thing that ever happened to this site.
And yeah, of course there hasn't been drama, maid's abandoned the boards lmao

 No.3146

File: 1487812334892.png (60.49 KB, 400x400, melon joe.png)

(TAKE IT BACK TO /MELON/ )

 No.3147

>>3143
Oh, I know. Good old times.But found it ironic that in less than a month since this thread was created, another thread got shit and someone got banned.

>>3146
Weren't the rules changed about a year ago and Corey became allowed outside of /melon/ ?

 No.3148

>>3147
No one actually got banned
Those were joke 1 second bans.

 No.3149

>>3145
I could remember that Preasul posted a sticky on Off-Topic about the Corey board before you said that you didn't need it anymore, let alone Moog experimentation.
('*')


File: 1483392352392.png (52.98 KB, 1203x422, ticker.PNG)

 No.3122[Reply]

Yo.
I use the recent posts section of the main page to view updates to threads I had recently participated in.
It can be difficult though because it doesn't mention what thread the post is from, only the board.

Currently it's structured like this

(Board):(>>comment)
(Board):(>>comment)
(Board):(>>comment)

What ends out happening is I have to click on all the links to find which one I had posted in because there is not indication which posts belong to what thread.

I think the recent posts section should be

(Thread):(>>comment)
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
4 posts omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.3132

How's that? Each row has a link to the thread and a link to the individual post, and the thread link when moused over gives the full name of the board.

Working in the name of the thread is possible but more difficult because of how the software is written.

 No.3133

>>3132
Not trying to force you to implement this or anything (I'm just asking because I think this would be something nice to have), but is it possible to make the front page redirect you to the [last 50 posts] of a thread if the post counter is =<50? That'd speed things up with loading long threads.

 No.3134

>>3133
The last 50 posts feature isn't working at all for me currently so this will require some digging if I do it.

 No.3135

>>3132
Thank you very much.
Just the numbers is fine. Just seeing what posts belong to the same threads is more than enough.
This makes it much easier to quickly drop into the site. Thanks.

 No.3140

Maybe a structure like this:

(Board);(Thread):(>>comment)
(Board);(Thread):(>>comment)
(Board);(Thread):(>>comment)

It's just an idea.


Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26]
| Catalog
[ yn / yndd / fg / yume ] [ o / lit / media / og / ig / 2 ] [ ot / cc / x / sugg ] [ hikki / rec ] [ news / rules / faq / recent / annex / manage ] [ discord / matrix / scans / mud / minecraft / usagi ] [ sushigirl / lewd ]